income of the deceased were produced and the deceased was a skilled labour, therefore, the learned Tribunal in absence of any such documenary evidence, the learned Tribunal has not considered the income of the deceased to be Rs.10,000/- per month and treated him as unskilled labour and considering the minimum wages of an unskilled labour, has rightly assessed his income to be Rs.4050/- and after considering future prospects has added Rs.2025/- total Rs.6075/- per month income has been taken into consideration. The learned Tribunal has also considered the Ex.8 and 10, in which though the age of the deceased was shown as 30 years, however, in the said documents the age mentioned was imaginary and no strict proof of date of birth of the deceased was produced, therefore, the learned Tribunal has considered the age of the deceased to be 35 years. The learned Tribunal after deducting 1/3rd qua personal expenses, has rightly assessed the yearly income of the deceased at Rs.48,600/- and while applying the multiplier of 16 has rightly assess the loss of income at Rs.7,77,600/-. This Court also finds that the learned Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- to the claimant No.1 towards the loss of consortium, which in the opinion of this Court is adequate and calls for no interference by this Court. 16. This Court also finds that towards the loss of love and affection, Rs.50,000/- each have been awarded to the parents of the deceased and Rs.25,000/- have been awarded to the son of the deceased. Towards the expenses incurred for funeral, loss of assets and transportation the learned Tribunal has awarded Rs.25,000/- in favour of claimants. In sum and substance, in view of judgments passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in Sarla Verma’s case
