Contempt petition against State Bank of India officials; petitioner did not press it and the court dismissed the petition, dropping contempt proceedings and discharging notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:1524]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 103/2021
Sajjan Singh S/o Shri Hukam Singh, Aged About 40 Years, By Caste Rajput, R/o Leelriya Dhora, Ward No. 1, Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. SP Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jagdish Chandra Vyas
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
10/01/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present contempt petition.
Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed; accordingly the contempt proceedings are dropped and notices stand discharged.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
156-Sudheer/-
Sajjan Singh
The State Bank Of India (through Chief General Manager, Zonal Office, Barmer)
Amit Sen
Rajendra Verma
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
