Motilal S/O Prabhulal v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Coram accepted the petitioners' application for suspension of sentence under Section 389 CrPC pending high court appeal. The court refused to fix contingent bonds, directing them to approach the court with bonds, and deferred disposal. (Thin order)
What did the court decide?
Sentence suspended subject to submission of contingent bonds. Contingent bonds not specified in this order.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JP:8414]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
- S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 67/2024
In
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 98/2024
- Motilal S/o Prabhulal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Tehroli P.s. Sangod Distt Kota (Accused In Jail At Kota)
- Chhatrasal @ Chatrasal S/o Prabhulal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Tehroli P.s. Sangod Distt. Kota
- Kunjbihari S/o Amarlal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vinod Khrd P.s. Sangod Dist. Kota (Accused In Jail At Kota)
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to suspend the sentence of conviction pending appeal.
Whether to grant contingent bonds and security for the suspension of sentence.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Motilal S/o Prabhulal
- petitioner
Chhatrasal @ Chatrasal S/o Prabhulal
- petitioner
Kunjbihari S/o Amarlal
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- SOSA/67/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court