Allowed

Sarjeet @ Sonu S/O Giriraj Parsad v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Feb 2024CRLMB/1785/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail application of an accused facing charges under Sections 323, 341, 325, 326, 307, and 34 IPC. Considering the delay in trial and detention period, bail was granted subject to furnishing bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted subject to execution of personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Sarjeet @ Sonu S/O Giriraj Parsad Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:8089]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1785/2024

¶4

Sarjeet @ Sonu S/o Giriraj Parsad, R/o Guvada Tahsil Bansur Police Station Harsuora District-Kotputli Bahrod (Accused Petitioner Is In Sub Jail Bahror).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mithun Bhai Chaturvedi For Respondent(s) : Mr. C.G. Chopra, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶11

Order

¶12

16/02/2024

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ljthr mQZ lksuw dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 06-02-2024 ds fo:) ;g tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk] mls iqfyl Fkkuk gjlkSjk] ftyk vyoj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 50@2023] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 323] 341] 325] 326] 307] 34 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

cgl lquh xbZA

¶15

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks ekeys esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ fnukad&01-02-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k ds lg&vfHk;qDrx.k lqjs'k] fxjkZt izlkn o fjadw ds tekur vkosnu i= iwoZ esa blh U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj fd, tk pqds gSa] izkFkhZ dk ekeyk buls fHkUu ugha gSA izdj.k ds vuqla/kku ,oa fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur ij NksM+k tkosA

¶16

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;kA

[CRLMB-1785/2024]

[2024:RJ-JP:8089]

(2 of 2)

geus nksuksa i{kksa }kjk izLrqr rdkasZ o fordksZa ij euu fd;kA izkFkhZ fnukad&01-02-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k ds lg&vfHk;qDrx.k lqjs'k] fxjkZt izlkn o fjadw ds tekur vkosnu i= iwoZ esa blh U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj fd, tk pqds gSaA izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk ls badkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA vr% nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdksZa] izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] vuqla/kku ds nkSjku vk;h lk{;] izkFkhZ dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; o vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶21

ifj.kker% ;g tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs :i;s ipkl gtkj ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@&:i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ljthr mQZ lksuw iq= fxjkZt izlkn dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa oakfNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶22

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶23

MANOJ ADWANI/07

Sarjeet @ Sonu S/O Giriraj Parsad v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarjeet @ Sonu S/O Giriraj Parsad v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarfu Vs State

Rohit Kumar Verma S/O Shri Bhanwar Lal Verma Vs State of Rajasthan

Chetram Bairwa Son of Shri Narayan Vs Ummed Singh Son of Gopal

Mohammed Yunus S/O Abdul Razzak Vs State of Rajasthan

Davendra Kumar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Manav Surgical Bhawani Market Vs State of Rajasthan