The High Court allowed an application for suspension of sentence, noting that major witnesses turned hostile, medical evidence contradicted witness statements, and the appeal disposal would take time.
Sentence suspended subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application No.
2192/2024
In
D.B. Criminal Appeal No.390/2024
----Accused/Applicant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Accused/ : Mr. Rinesh Gupta with Applicant(s) Mr. SPS Chauhan Mr. Gaurav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, AGA with Ms. Neha Goyal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
[SOSA-2192/2024]
(2 of 3)
Order
03/12/2024
[SOSA-2192/2024]
(3 of 3)
furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court to the effect that he shall appear before this Court as and when called upon to do so.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Heena/62
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the sentence of the accused-applicants should be suspended pending appeal given hostile witnesses and procedural delays?
State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
