Disposed
Biju Murlidharan Son of Shri Soman Murlidharan v. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan HCSOSA/1035/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR…
What the court decided
AI extract
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:3292]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1035/2022
In
S.B.Criminal Appeal No-1628/2022
Biju Murlidharan Son Of Shri Soman Murlidharan, Resident Of Pajhyamadthil Uthritthi Veddinadu, Market Junction Vembayam Vattappra Police Station Vattappara District Thiruvantharapuram Kerala Presently Tenant House No. 159 K-5 C Scheme Near Lal Mandir, Khatipura Police Station Vaishali Nagr, Jaipur At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp
----Respondent
______________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Jh gjsUnz flag flufluokj For Respondent(s) : Jh ,u-,l-xqtZj] yksd vfHk;kstd
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
19-01-2024
vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls fopkj.k U;k;ky; vfrfjDr ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k¼ efgyk mRihM+u izdj.k½ t;iqj egkuxj] t;iqj }kjk lS'ku izdj.k la[;k& 40@2022] ljdkj cuke chtw eqjyh/kju esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o naMkns'k fnukad 04-08-2022 ds fo:) ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftlds }kjk vfHk;qDr dks vkjksfir vijk/kksa esa nks"kfl) fd;k tkdj vFkZn.M lfgr vf/kdre nl o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS A
cgl lquh xbZA
[SOSA-1035/2022]
[2024:RJ-JP:3292]
(2 of 2)
fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dk lexz foospu o fo'ys"k.k fd, fcuk vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ,oa n.Mkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS A vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk ihfM+rk ds lkFk fdlh izdkj dk nq"deZ ugha fd;k x;k gS] vihykFkhZ fopkj.k ds nkSjku tekur jgk gS] mldh vfHkj{kk vof/k yxHkx 20 ekg ls vf/kd gks pqdh gS] izLrqr vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkosA
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;kA
geus mHk;i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k] i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@& :i, ¼ v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa 25]000&25000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s½ dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 19-02-2024 dks ,oa rRi'pkr~ tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk] rks vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr chtw eqjyh/kju iq= Jh lkseu eqjyh/kju dks vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mijksDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ds rgr fn, x, n.Mkns'k ¼sentence½ dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
Rishikesh Soni/18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suspended sentence applicant is entitled to benefits of Section 15 and 42 of CrPC and proviso to Section 42.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Biju Murlidharan
State Of Rajasthan
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court