Chhitar Ram v. Sampat Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant challenged an order under Article 227 via special appeal after admitting maintainability. This court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable.
What did the court decide?
Special appeal dismissed as not maintainable.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JD:3436-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 905/2023
Chhitar Ram S/o Late Shri Prema Ram, Aged About 51 Years, (So Called Mentally Infirm) Through Mentor Smt. Lichhma W/o Shri Chhitar Ram, Aged 48 Years, Resident Of Palada Road, Opposite Muskan Marriage Garden, Makrana, District Nagaur.
----Appellant
Versus
- Sampat Kumar S/o Shri Kalyan Mal Toshniwal, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of Near Pabu Ji Chabuta, Makrana, District Nagaur.
- Amri Devi W/o Late Shri Prema Ram, Resident Of Palada Road, Opposite Muskan Marriage Garden, Makrana, District Nagaur.
- State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Nagaur. 3A. Director, Mines And Geology Department, Udaipur. 3B. Mining Engineer, Mines And Geology Department, Makrana, District Nagaur.
----Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. Aditya Singhi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : |
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chhitar Ram S/o Late Shri Prema Ram
- respondent
Sampat Kumar S/o Shri Kalyan Mal Toshniwal
- respondent
Amri Devi W/o Late Shri Prema Ram
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan Through District Collector Nagaur
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAW/905/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court