For Special Appeal, the High Court dismissed appellant's challenge to Single Judge's order rejecting her claim that physical examination was conducted at an unauthorized centre, noting she underwent examination at a Divisional Headquarters in Kota.
Special Appeal and stay application were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:7780-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 504/2023
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4205/2023
Neha Yadav W/o Vipin Yadav, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 629, Devi Nagar, New Sanganer Road, Sodala, Jaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Siddharth Jain Mutha
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
15/02/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:7780-DB]
[SAW-504/2023]
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
AMIT/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant's failure to point out malafide or bias prevents quashing of selection objections regarding Centre of Examination.
Neha Yadav
1. State of Rajasthan through Additional Chief Secretary, Local Self Government
2. The Director, Local Self Government
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board
Pankaj Bhandari
Bhuvan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
