Dinesh v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Jodhpur dismissed the writ petition and stay petition for want of prosecution noting that peremptory notices extending the response time were not filed within the stipulated period.
What did the court decide?
None. Writ petition and stay petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JD:19318]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 987/2021
Dinesh S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 20 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Swamiyo Ka Bas, Dangiyawas, Jodhpur, Raj.
----Petitioner
- Versus
- Union Of India, Through Secretary Of Ministry Of Defence, Lodi Road, New Delhi-0011.
- Manjor General, Core Commandant, Sub Area Panjab, Chandigarh-05.
- The Commandant, 36 Field Ammunition Depot Pin 9000484 C/o 56 Apo.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dinesh S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal
- respondent
Union Of India
- respondent
Manjor General, Core Commandant, Sub Area Panjab
- respondent
The Commandant, 36 Field Ammunition Depot
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/987/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court