Disposed

Vijay Kumar Verma v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 May 2024CW/930/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking regularization of services was disposed of in light of the Co-ordinate Bench decision in Jitendra Kumar Tailor, with a direction to the State Government to decide the matter and facilitate issuance of requisite regularization order within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed with direction to State Govt. to decide regularization matter within four weeks; stay petition also disposed of.

Vijay Kumar Verma Vs the State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:18963]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 930/2024

¶4

Vijay Kumar Verma S/o Shri Ram Swaroop Verma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 72, Ward No.2, Bharat Nagar, Purani Abadi, Ganganagar, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Local Self, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

1. The Director, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶9

1. The Municipal Council Sri Ganganagar, Through Its Commissioner, Sri Ganganagar District Sri Ganganagar.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. JS Bhaleria For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Parihar

¶12

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶13

Order

¶14

01/05/2024

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is squarely covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1952/2019 , decided on 06.07.2020, which in turn had relied on order in the case of Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18056/2015 , decided on 09.03.2017.

¶16

In the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra), a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court inter alia directed as under:

¶17

“In this view of the matter, I deem it just and

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JD:18963]

[CW-930/2024]

appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the State Govt. to decide the matter at the earliest to facilitate issuance of requisite order of regularization of petitioner’s services, strictly in accordance with law. The requisite exercise be undertaken by the State Govt. at the earliest, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date presentation of this order.”

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to dispute the fact that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

¶23

In view of the above fact situation, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of, in light of and with similar directions as given in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

¶24

Stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶25

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶26

S3-raksha/-

Vijay Kumar Verma v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kumar Verma v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hanuman Singh Bhati Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Ram Vs the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Mulak Raj Vs M/S Yadav Stone Crising Company

Jugal Kishore Kachawaha Vs State of Rajasthan

Dalip Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Simran Arora Vs the State of Rajasthan