Petitioner moved an application for withdrawal of the writ petition, submitting that the matter had rendered infructuous as the DRT Jaipur had become functional. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:33484]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9659/2024
Sunil Chaudhary S/o Shri Krishna Kant Choudhary, Aged About 55 Years, Proprietor Of M/s Impressive Art Interior, Having Office At 102, 101, First Floor, Aakruti Complex, 4 New Fatehpura, Udaipur, Rajasthan - 313001.
----Petitioner
Versus
| ----Respondents | ||
|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Ms. Shruti Rathi for Mr. Avin Chhangani |
|
| For Respondent(s) | : --- |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order
12/08/2024
Counsel submits that when the present writ petition was preferred, at that point of time, the DRT Jaipur was not functional. But now, as the Tribunal is functional, a prayer to withdraw the writ petition has been made.
(REKHA BORANA),J
264-Devanshi/-
Sunil Chaudhary
District Collector, Udaipur
Icici Bank Ltd.
REKHA BORANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
