The High Court held that it lacks writ jurisdiction to adjudicate on revenue record entries or chak plan accuracy regarding public paths. The matter was directed to the competent authority via a representation.
Petitioners to file a detailed representation to the competent authority within 15 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:33231]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1008/2015
Banwari And Ors
----Petitioners
Versus
State And Ors.
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Praveen Karwa for |
|---|---|
| Mr. J.S. Bhaleria | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Nonepresent |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
08/08/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:33231]
[CW-1008/2015]
(2 of 2)
(REKHA BORANA),J
335-T.Singh/-
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can adjudicate under Article 226 on the correctness of entries regarding public paths in revenue chak plans.
Whether the Command Area Development Department is authorized to sanction public paths or if that lies exclusively with revenue authorities.
What direction should be issued when the matter is outside the writ jurisdiction of the High Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Banwari And Ors
State And Ors.
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
