Writ petitions against forest department notices under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 calling upon petitioners to show cause why they should not be dispossessed from allegedly encroached forest land. Court disposed of petitions directing reply within 30 days and speaking order by authority within six weeks; no dispossession till order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:41376]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14965/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 13)
[2024:RJ-JD:41376]
[CW-14965/2023]
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9571/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12567/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
(3 of 13)
[2024:RJ-JD:41376]
[CW-14965/2023]
Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).
(4 of 13)
[2024:RJ-JD:41376]
[CW-14965/2023]
Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3147/2023
(5 of 13)
[2024:RJ-JD:41376]
[CW-14965/2023]
(6 of 13)
[2024:RJ-JD:41376]
[CW-14965/2023]
(7 of 13)
[2024:RJ-JD:41376]
[CW-14965/2023]
(8 of 13)
[2024:RJ-JD:41376]
[CW-14965/2023]
(9 of 13)
[2024:RJ-JD:41376]
[CW-14965/2023]
(10 of 13)
[2024:RJ-JD:41376]
[CW-14965/2023]
(11 of 13)
[2024:RJ-JD:41376]
[CW-14965/2023]
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| [2024:RJ-JD:41376] | (12 of 13) [CW-14965/2023] |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sihag in SBCWP No.14965/2023 None appears in other writpetitions. |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Mishra, G.C. for Forest Department |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
09/10/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:41376]
[CW-14965/2023]
(13 of 13)
However, if the respondents reaches to a conclusion that the petitioners are encroachers on the land in question, they would be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.
(REKHA BORANA),J
49-53/KashishS/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ petitions challenging show cause notices under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 for alleged encroachment on forest land should be kept pending.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukesh
State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Forest Department, Secretariat, Jaipur
District Forest Officer, Hanumangarh
The Assistant Conservator Of Forest, Hanumangarh
Devi Lal
Krishan Kumar
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
