Disposed

Krishan Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Oct 2024CW/12567/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitions challenged show-cause notices issued under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 by the Assistant Conservator of Forest calling upon villagers to explain why they should not be dispossessed from allegedly encroached forest land. The court declined to keep the petitions pending and directed the authorities to decide on the petitioners' replies with a speaking order.

What the court decided

AI extract

Krishan Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Property and Title | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:41376]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14965/2023

¶4

Mukesh S/o Sh. Ramkumar, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Aradki, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶5

Chananram S/o Sh. Purnaram, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Aradki, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶6

Indraj S/o Sh. Udaram, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Aradki, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶7

Jaydev S/o Sh. Bhadarram, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Aradki, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶8

Vinod S/o Sh. Satveer Bharti, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Aradki, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶9

Ramkumar S/o Sh. Hazariram, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Aradki, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶10

Krishan S/o Sh. Patram, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Aradki, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶11

Balwant S/o Sh. Patram, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Aradki, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶12

Dayaram S/o Sh. Mamchand, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Aradki, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶13

Leeladhar S/o Sh. Nathuram, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Aradki, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶14

----Petitioners

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Forest Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶17

District Forest Officer, Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶18

The Assistant Conservator Of Forest, Hanumangarh, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

----Respondents

(2 of 13)

[2024:RJ-JD:41376]

[CW-14965/2023]

Connected With

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9571/2022

¶25

Devi Lal S/o Shri Bhadar Ram, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Sheopura, Nohar, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶26

Ramnivas S/o Shri Bhadar Ram, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Sheopura, Nohar, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶27

----Petitioners

¶28

Versus

¶29

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Forest Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶30

District Forest Officer, Hanumangarh (Rajasthan). 3. Assistant Conservator Of Forest, Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶31

District Collector, Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶32

----Respondents

¶33

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12567/2022

¶34

Krishan Kumar S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Gheu, Tehsil Bhadra District Hanumangarh.

¶35

Mahender Kumar S/o Kashi Ram, Aged About 48 Years, R/ o Village Gheu, Tehsil Bhadra District Hanumangarh.

¶36

Madan Lal S/o Kashi Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Gheu, Tehsil Bhadra District Hanumangarh.

¶37

Munshi Ram S/o Kashi Ram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Gheu, Tehsil Bhadra District Hanumangarh.

¶38

----Petitioners

¶39

Versus

¶40

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Forest Department, Of Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶41

Deputy Conservator Forest, Hanumangarh Camp, Bhadra, District Hanumangarh.

¶42

----Respondents

¶43

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2995/2023

¶44

1. Krishan S/o Shri Sultan Brahmin, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil

(3 of 13)

[2024:RJ-JD:41376]

[CW-14965/2023]

Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶49

Pratap Singh S/o Shri Balveer Meghwal, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶50

Doularam S/o Shri Sundaram Meghwal, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶51

Baadri Ram S/o Shri Nanakram Meghwal, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶52

Pratap Singh S/o Shri Hajari Ram Jat, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶53

Mahendra S/o Shri Khiraj Jat, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶54

Hanuman S/o Shri Surja Ram Jat, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶55

Sadhu Ram S/o Shri Bhadar Ram Meghwal, Aged About 71 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶56

Balveer S/o Shri Maysukh Khati, Aged About 73 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶57

Rohtash S/o Shri Maysukh Khati, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶58

Vinod S/o Shri Jaysingh Meghwal, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶59

Rohtash S/o Shri Jaysingh Meghwal, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶60

Bagrawat S/o Shri Shankraram Meghwal, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶61

Mahendra S/o Shri Manphool Jat, Aged About 60 Years,

(4 of 13)

[2024:RJ-JD:41376]

[CW-14965/2023]

Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶66

Tara Chand S/o Shri Manphool Jat, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶67

Hansram S/o Shri Hari Singh Jat, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶68

Mahipal S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Aged About 64 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶69

Dalip S/o Shri Rameshwar Meghwal, Aged About 67 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶70

Balwan S/o Shri Mahaveer Meghwal, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶71

Amar Singh S/o Shri Harpat Ram, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶72

Jagdish S/o Shri Ramji Lal Jat, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶73

Rameshwar S/o Shri Kashi Ram Jat, Aged About 67 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶74

Hari Singh S/o Shri Bhoma Ram Jat, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas, Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶75

----Petitioners

¶76

Versus

¶77

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Forest Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶78

District Forest Officer, Hanumangarh (Rajasthan). 3. Assistant Conservator Of Forest, Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶79

----Respondents

¶80

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3147/2023

(5 of 13)

[2024:RJ-JD:41376]

[CW-14965/2023]

Sitaram S/o Shri Balveer Singh, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶85

Aatma Ram S/o Shri Sheoram Jat, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶86

Biru Ram S/o Shri Bhadar Ram Nai, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶87

Mahipal S/o Shri Kashi Ram Jat, Aged About 67 Years, R/ o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶88

Data Ram S/o Shri Pat Ram Jat, Aged About 57 Years, R/ o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶89

Rampat S/o Shri Shankara Ram Meghwal, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶90

Mahaveer S/o Shri Hari Singh Dhanak, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶91

Vidhya Sagar S/o Shri Rampratap Jat, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶92

Rameshwar S/o Shri Shankaram Ram Meghwal, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶93

Madu Ram S/o Shri Maglu Ram Jat, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶94

Kuldeep S/o Shri Ram Singh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶95

Omprakash S/o Shri Mehar Chand, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶96

Sharwan Kumar S/o Shri Bhoop Singh Harijan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

(6 of 13)

[2024:RJ-JD:41376]

[CW-14965/2023]

Lilu Ram @jagdish S/o Shri Jaisaram, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶101

Rajendra S/o Shri Bhoop Singh Meghwal, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶102

Satveer S/o Shri Moman Ram Meghwal, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶103

Jagdish S/o Shri Pataram Meghwal, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶104

Mahendar S/o Shri Mehar Chand Jat, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶105

Devi Lal S/o Shri Indraj Jat, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶106

Sant Lal S/o Shri Jaisaram, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶107

Rajendra S/o Shri Ramji Lal Jat, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶108

Lilu Ram S/o Shri Rajkumar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶109

Omprakash S/o Shri Ramji Lal Jat, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶110

Rajendra Prasad S/o Shri Hansram Jat, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶111

Krishan Kumar S/o Shri Sultan Khati, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶112

Surendra S/o Shri Hardevaram Jat, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

(7 of 13)

[2024:RJ-JD:41376]

[CW-14965/2023]

Santlal S/o Shri Chetram Valmiki, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶117

Shankar Lal S/o Shri Bhani Ram Nayak, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶118

Balwan S/o Shri Bhoop Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶119

Rampratap @ Rampat S/o Shri Bhadar Ram, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶120

Ramswaroop S/o Shri Rameshwar Jat, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶121

Indraj S/o Shri Munshi Ram Kumhar, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶122

Prahlad S/o Shri Kashi Ram Jat, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶123

Bharat Singh S/o Shri Rajkumar Jat, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶124

Mahaveer Singh S/o Shri Surja Ram Jat, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶125

Mahaveer S/o Shri Patram Jat, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶126

Subhash S/o Shri Sant Lal Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶127

Devi Lal S/o Shri Patram Jat, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶128

Ray Singh S/o Shri Patram Jat, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

(8 of 13)

[2024:RJ-JD:41376]

[CW-14965/2023]

Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Daluram Khati, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶133

Daluram S/o Shri Panna Lal Khati, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶134

Dhapa W/o Late Shri Dayaram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶135

Shankar Lal S/o Shri Vajira Ram, Aged About 42 Years, R/ o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶136

Lilu Ram S/o Shri Udmi Ram Jat, Aged About 40 Years, R/ o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶137

Vajiraram S/o Shri Liluram Sanchi, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶138

Kashmiri Lal S/o Shri Jarla Ram Sanchi, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶139

Subhash S/o Shri Bhadar Ram Nai, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶140

Laxmi Narayan S/o Shri Patram, Aged About 74 Years, R/ o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶141

Shishpal S/o Shri Hariram Khati, Aged About 60 Years, R/ o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶142

Mahendra S/o Shri Bhadar Ram Nai, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶143

Rakesh Kumar S/o Shri Daluram Khati, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶144

Rajkumar S/o Shri Hardeva Ram Jat, Aged About 88 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

(9 of 13)

[2024:RJ-JD:41376]

[CW-14965/2023]

Budh Lal S/o Shri Amilal Khati, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶149

Harish Chandra S/o Shri Hansram Khati, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶150

Gopiram S/o Shri Hira Ram Khati, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶151

Rakesh S/o Shri Mani Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶152

Pratap S/o Shri Ranjeet, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶153

Sandeep S/o Shri Chetram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶154

Jashrath @ Dashrath S/o Shri Nathuram Jat, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶155

Jai Singh S/o Shri Ramkumar Sharma, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶156

Mahendra S/o Shri Mahaveer Dhanak, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶157

Rooparam S/o Shri Bhadar Ram Nai, Aged About 80 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶158

Krishan S/o Shri Hansram Jat, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶159

Jagdish S/o Shri Munshiram Kumhar, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶160

Rishpal S/o Shri Thakar Ram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

(10 of 13)

[2024:RJ-JD:41376]

[CW-14965/2023]

Aatma Ram S/o Shri Khyali Ram Jat, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶165

Raju S/o Shri Nihal Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶166

Norang S/o Shri Panna Ram Khati, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶167

Devi Lal S/o Shri Ramkumar Brahmin, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶168

Mahendra Singh S/o Shri Ladu Ram Jat, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶169

Hardayal S/o Shri Ratna Ram Nayak, Aged About 81 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶170

Krishan S/o Shri Basti Ram Nayak, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶171

Moman Ram S/o Shri Basti Ram Nayak, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶172

Ramniwas S/o Shri Maniram Nai, Aged About 61 Years, R/ o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶173

Jagdish S/o Shri Maniram Nai, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶174

Amar Singh S/o Shri Ami Lal Khati, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶175

Kurda Ram S/o Shri Hardayal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶176

Santlal S/o Shri Manuram Bhat, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

(11 of 13)

[2024:RJ-JD:41376]

[CW-14965/2023]

Jai Singh S/o Shri Aadram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶181

Jagdish S/o Shri Pat Ram, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶182

Mohar Singh S/o Shri Pat Ram Jat, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶183

Jai Singh S/o Shri Surja Ram Meghwal, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶184

Pramod Kumar S/o Shri Ramratan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶185

Gulab S/o Shri Laduram Jat, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶186

Rohitash S/o Shri Sheoram Jat, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶187

Rameshwar S/o Shri Magharam, Aged About 74 Years, R/ o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶188

Mange Ram S/o Shri Gangu Ram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Lalanabaas Nathwaniya, Lalana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶189

----Petitioners

¶190

Versus

¶191

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Forest Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶192

District Forest Officer, Hanumangarh (Rajasthan). 3. Assistant Conservator Of Forest, Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.)

¶193

----Respondents

¶194

[2024:RJ-JD:41376]	(12 of 13) [CW-14965/2023]
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Vinod Kumar Sihag in SBCWP No.14965/2023 None appears in other writpetitions.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Jitendra Kumar Mishra, G.C. for Forest Department

¶195

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA

¶196

Order

¶197

09/10/2024

¶198

The present writ petitions have been preferred aggrieved of the notices issued to the petitioners by the Assistant Conservator of Forest, Hanumangarh in terms of Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1956’) calling upon them to show cause as to why they should not be dispossessed from the land in question i.e. the forest land, on which they had encroached.

¶199

Keeping in view the fact that the issue whether the petitioners are encroachers on the land in question or not, is ultimately to be decided by the authorities concerned, this Court does not find any ground to keep the present petitions pending. The present writ petitions are therefore disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file their respective response in pursuance to the impugned notice, to the Assistant Conservator of Forest, Hanumangarh within a period of 30 days from now.

¶200

The petitioners shall be at liberty to annex all the documents along with their reply to show that they are not in wrongful possession and possess the title deeds/proof of long possession, pertaining to the land in question.

[2024:RJ-JD:41376]

[CW-14965/2023]

(13 of 13)

Assistant Conservator of Forest, Hanumangarh shall be under an obligation to consider the reply as preferred by the petitioners and after considering the said reply and the documents annexed, he would pass a speaking order. The order, whatsoever, be passed within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of the reply.

¶205

Till the said order is passed, the petitioners shall not be dispossessed from the land in question.

¶206

However, if the respondents reaches to a conclusion that the petitioners are encroachers on the land in question, they would be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.

¶207

It is further made clear that if no reply to the impugned notice is filed within a period of 30 days, the respondent authorities shall be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.

¶208

Stay petitions and all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of .

¶209

(REKHA BORANA),J

¶210

49-53/KashishS/-

Krishan Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Krishan Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj. State Board Tran. Corpn., Vs State of Raj. and Ors.

Savitri Bai Vs State of Rajasthan

Om Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Devi Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Lrs of Lt. Sh. Naina Ram S/O Shri Goverdhan Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Santosh Vs Bhanwar Singh Alias Bhanwar Lal