Allowed

Prahlad Ram Yadav S/O Shri Phoolaram v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Jan 2024CW/660/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge bench disposed of a writ petition concerning pension entitlements. Relying on the Division Bench judgment in Ramesh Chander Gupta (2021), the court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's claim, pass appropriate orders within two months, and release any payable amount within one month. All stay and pending applications were also disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to have claim considered and appropriate orders passed within two months; payable amount to be released within one month. Stay and pending applications disposed of.

Prahlad Ram Yadav S/O Shri Phoolaram Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:2917]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 660/2024

¶4

Prahlad Ram Yadav S/o Shri Phoolaram, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Puchalawali Dhani, Distt. Neem Ka Thana (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Secondary Education Government Secretariat Jaipur(Raj.).

¶8

The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner.

¶9

The Dy. Director (Secondary) Education, Jaipur Division, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶10

The District Education Officer (Secondary), Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Neem Ka Thana (Raj).

¶11

The Director, Directorate Of Pension And Pensioners Welfare, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jyothi Nagar, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302015

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S Raghav, AAG

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶15

Judgment / Order

¶16

18/01/2024

¶17

Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been put to rest by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in case of Ramesh Chander Gupta vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2800/2021 and other connected matters,

¶18

decided on 17.10.2023 .

¶19

In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra) , Division Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in Union of India & Ors. vs. Manohar Lal & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ

¶20

Petition No.5445/2022, decided on 07.08.2023 & the

[2024:RJ-JP:2917]

[CW-660/2024]

(2 of 2)

Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. vs. Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4139/2022 as well as judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of The Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL & Ors. vs. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC online SC 401 has passed the following directions:-

¶25

“It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No.3420/2023 and Special Leave Petition (C) No.1001/2023 have also been disposed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of orders dated 11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court have also been placed on record. Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off on the same terms with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders and other consequential benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found payable be also released within a period of one month. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of.”

¶26

Learned AAG appearing for the respondents does not dispute the fact that the issue, as raised in the present writ petitions is similar to Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra).

¶27

In view of the joint statement of the learned counsel for the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition on the same terms and with direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim and pass appropriate orders in the light of the Division Bench judgment, as referred to above, within a period of two months.

¶28

Since the main petition has been disposed of, the stay application and pending application/s, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶29

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶30

Seema/2

Prahlad Ram Yadav S/O Shri Phoolaram v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prahlad Ram Yadav S/O Shri Phoolaram v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sharad Dadhich Son of Shri Narendra Kumar Dadhich Vs the State of Rajasthan

Suja Ram S/O Har Lal Ram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Smt. Saroj Yadav D/O Jagmal Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramesh Kumar Vaidya Ors. Vs State

Santosh Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Mohan Lal Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ramswaroop Meena S/O Shri Banwari Lal Meena Vs the State of Rajasthan