Petitioner sought a writ; counsel submitted the petition became infructuous due to subsequent facts. Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:2825]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 443/2022
Sharad Dadhich Son Of Shri Narendra Kumar Dadhich, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Papurana, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prahlad Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rupin Kala
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
17/01/2024
Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent facts, after filing of this petition, the petition has rendered infructuous.
In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Since, the present petition is dismissed and other pending application/s, if any, stand/s disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Seema/284
Sharad Dadhich
The State Of Rajasthan
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
