Petitioner challenged a notice issued by the Deputy SP seeking explanation. The Court held no prejudicial action had been taken and no disciplinary proceedings initiated, so the writ was premature, dismissed it along with the stay application, and left him free to reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:7582]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5906/2023
Madan Singh S/o Nathu Singh Sisodiya, Aged About 50 Years, Ward No.4, Hatkiya Gada, District Dungarpur (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : -
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
14/02/2024
(2 of 2) [CW-5906/2023]
[2024:RJ-JD:7582]
(DINESH MEHTA),J
34-akansha/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition lies against a mere show-cause notice seeking an explanation before any disciplinary proceeding is initiated?
Madan Singh S/o Nathu Singh Sisodiya
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Home Department
The Inspector General Of Police, Udaipur Range, Udaipur
The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Circle Ghatol, District Banswara
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
