Disposed

Mamta Chauhan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC30 May 2024CW/5865/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction to decide her representation in light of a coordinate Bench order in Vasudev. Respondents agreed; without commenting on merits, the court directed the competent authority to decide the representation in accordance with law in view of Vasudev as expeditiously as possible.

What did the court decide?

Direction to competent authority to decide the petitioner's representation in light of Vasudev (supra), expeditiously.

Mamta Chauhan Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:24941]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5865/2024

¶4

Mamta Chauhan W/o Bhagwan Prakash Chauhan, Aged About 52 Years, R/o 257-258, Chitrakoot Nagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶8

The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Ms. Kusha Sharma for Mr. Hemant
	Jain.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vishal Jangid,Dy. G.C.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

¶12

Order

¶13

30/05/2024

¶14

For the reasons stated in the application (IA No.01/2024), prayer for preponement of date in the case is allowed and the main case is taken up on Board today itself.

¶15

Application is disposed of.

¶16

Main Case

¶17

At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner states that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by an order passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Vasudev & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15470/2022 , & other connected matters, decided on 24.08.2023. She submits that the respondents may be

[2024:RJ-JD:24941]

[CW-5865/2024]

(2 of 2)

directed to consider the representation of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment.

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondents is also agreeable to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶23

Without commenting on the merits of case, in view of the aforesaid joint submission, the competent authority of respondents is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made in the case of Vasudev (supra) , as expeditiously as possible.

¶24

(ARUN MONGA),J

¶25

84-/Jitender//-

Mamta Chauhan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mamta Chauhan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Renuka Upadhyay Vs State and Ors.

Ranjit Kumar Baid Vs the Registrar

Sita Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Parth Pandya Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Prasad Vs the State of Rajasthan

M/S Rajvansh Auto Wheels Private Limited Vs Ramchandra