Disposed

Jagdish Prasad v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC30 May 2024CW/5646/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought direction to consider their representation regarding pension welfare. Court disposed of the petition without deciding merits, directing authorities to decide the representation keeping in view the earlier judgment of Vijay Singh v. State of Rajasthan, expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Directed competent authority to decide petitioner's representation as expeditiously as possible, keeping in view observations in Vijay Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2023).

Jagdish Prasad Vs the State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:25118]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5646/2024

¶4

Jagdish Prasad Brother-In-Law/o Birbal Ram, Aged About 65 Years, Gavdi Ki Dhani, District Jalore.

¶5

Ugam Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 61 Years, Near Excise Office, Railway Station Colony, Jalore.

¶6

Nathu Singh S/o Hadmant Singh, Aged About 61 Years, Solankiyo Ka Baas, Tehsil Samdari, District Balora.

¶7

Rana Ram Choudhary S/o Deva Ram, Aged About 70 Years, Dabli, Post Khandap, District Balotra.

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Finance, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶11

1. The Directorate Of Pension And Welfare Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jyoti Nagar, Lal Kothi, Jaipur.

¶12

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶13

Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶14

Director General Of Police, Jaipur. 6. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Balotra. 7. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner. 8. District Education Officer (Elementary), Balotra.

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. M.K. Dudi
For Respondent(s)	:

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Order (Oral)

¶18

30/05/2024

¶19

At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by an order passed by this Court in case of Vijay Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21/2020 , decided on 21.07.2023 . He submits that the

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JD:25118]

[CW-5646/2024]

respondents may be directed to consider the representation of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment.

¶24

In view of the submissions made, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made in the case of Vijay Singh (supra), as expeditiously as possible.

¶25

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶26

(ARUN MONGA),J

¶27

69-AK Chouhan/-

Jagdish Prasad v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish Prasad v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Renuka Upadhyay Vs State and Ors.

Ranjit Kumar Baid Vs the Registrar

Sita Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Parth Pandya Vs State of Rajasthan

Mamta Chauhan Vs State of Rajasthan

M/S Rajvansh Auto Wheels Private Limited Vs Ramchandra