Writ petition by the Commissioner of Municipal Council, Sikar against five respondents was dismissed as infructuous on counsel's statement that it had become infructuous by efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5576/2022
Commissioner, Municipal Council, Sikar.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Kumar for Mr. Anil Mehta, AAG (Sr.Adv) For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
02/01/2024
Counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
KuD/25
Commissioner, Municipal Council, Sikar
Mahendra Singh Deval S/o Late Jeevan Singh
Sangram Singh S/o Late Sawai Singh
Dinesh Sharma S/o Late Shri Madan Lal Sharma
Surendra Bahad S/o Ratan Lal Bahad
Avdesh Sharma S/o Shyam Sunder Sharma
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
