Allowed

Manoj Kumar S/O Shri Bheekha Ram Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Jan 2024CW/547/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a writ petition seeking service benefits. Relying on a prior coordinate bench judgment, the court directed respondents to allow service benefits based on the petitioner's initial government appointment date in 1997.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to allow service benefits considering the date of initial appointment as 22.03.1997.

Manoj Kumar S/O Shri Bheekha Ram Yadav Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:1434]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 547/2023

¶4

Manoj Kumar S/o Shri Bheekha Ram Yadav, Aged About 51 Years, Presently Residing At 55 Shiv Colony, Tijara Fatak, Alwar, Rajasthan - 301001. (Presently Posted On The Post Of Senior Teacher (Varishth Adhyapak) At Government Senior Secondary School, Dogra, Kishangarh-Bas, Alwar)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The District Education Officer, Primary Education, Alwar.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. C. L. Saini, AAG

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

09/01/2024

¶14

Mr. C.L. Saini, AAG puts in appearance on behalf of both the respondents. Hence, service upon both the respondents is complete.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Jorawar Singh Vs.

¶16

State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.555/2005) , decided on 07.11.2006.

¶17

Counsel for the respondent-State admits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed in the case of Jorawar Singh (supra) and this petition

[2024:RJ-JP:1434]

[CW-547/2023]

(2 of 2)

may also be disposed in same terms and directions as given in case of Jorawar Singh (supra) .

¶22

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed off with the directions to the respondents to allow the service benefits to the petitioner by considering the date of initial appointment in the Government service i.e. 22.03.1997 and the petitioner would be entitled for consequential benefits, including the selection scale etc.

¶23

Since the main petition has been disposed of, all pending application/s, if any, also stand disposed.

¶24

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶25

GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /225

Manoj Kumar S/O Shri Bheekha Ram Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Kumar S/O Shri Bheekha Ram Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendra Kumar Malav S/O Chhitar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sudesh Kumar S/O Shri Jagmal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganpat Lal S/O Shri Surja Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Subhash Chand Garg Son of Shri Rambharosi Lal Garg Vs the State of Rajasthan

Lakhan Lal Sharma, S/O Shri Ram Singh Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishan Kumar Yadav S/O Shri Parixat Singh Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan