Writ petition dismissed as infructuous after counsel for petitioner stated lack of instructions, with liberty to approach Court again.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:23295-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4355/2000
M/s.india Golden Transport Company
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Anr
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Kothari. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Bhandawat.
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Order
22/05/2024
Mr. Vinay Kothari, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions in the matter.
On submission, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous with the liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court again, if needed.
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
11-Zeeshan
M/s India Golden Transport Company
State
DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
