Petitioner sought directions for expeditious disposal of a pending civil suit. Court referred to Apex Court precedent, declined to fix a bound schedule, but directed trial court to decide expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4333/2022
Bhanwar Singh Rathore Son Of Narayan Singh, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Plot Number 43 New Ganpati Nagar, A.k.a, Ashish Nagar Sitapura Jaipur Rajasthan, Permanent Address E 34 Village Jalana, Calgiri Road Malviya Nagar Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
23/04/2024
[CW-4333/2022]
(2 of 2)
Court Bar Association Allahabad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. while deciding Criminal Appeal No.3589/2023 has held that the Constitutional Court should not fix a time bound schedule for disposal of a case pending in any Court unless exceptional circumstances are there to meet the extraordinary situation.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
KuD/42
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can direct the trial court to decide the pending suit within a fixed time frame.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
High Court Bar Association AllahabadReferred¶18
High Court Bar Association Allahabad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Bhanwar Singh Rathore
B.K Batra
Saharan House Vikas Private Limited
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
