Writ petition dismissed in default for non-appearance of counsel for the petitioners despite prior directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:21400]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 304/2019
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Jain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
[2024:RJ-JP:21400]
[CW-304/2019]
(2 of 2)
Order
03/05/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioners is not appeared in spite of categoric direction dated 03/10/2023.
Today, when the matter was called, no one appeared on
behalf of the petitioners.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
ANIL SHARMA /23
Ajay Kumar Yadav
Anita Sharma
Shah Nawaz Hamid
Naval Kishor Sharma
Lalit Kumar Sharma
Tilak Chandra Sharma
SAMEER JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
