The High Court dismissed the D.B. Civil Writ Petition as infructuous, holding that no cause of action survived due to subsequent developments occurring during the petition's pendency.
The writ petition was dismissed as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:9348-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2585/2015
Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur, Through Its Secretary.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sanjay Jhanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr.Arjun Singh Mr.Anuroop Singhi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
23/02/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments during pendency of the writ petition, no cause of action survives for pursuing the petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Monika/16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has any cause of action following subsequent developments during its pendency.
Jaipur Development Authority
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemptions
Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemptions
AVNEESH JHINGAN
SHUBHA MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
