Counsel for parties were present. It was agreed that the deposited amount has been received by the respondent, rendering the cause of action extinguished. The appeal was dismissed as having become infructuous on agreed terms.
The appeal was dismissed as rendered infructuous due to agreement that the amount was deposited and paid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:9349-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil First Appeal No. 398/2022
----Appellants
Versus
Ms Bharti Construction Company, Kushal Bagh Banswara, Registered Partnership Firm Through Mukhtyar Aam Shri Satyanarayan Porwal S/o Shri Prabhulal Ji R/o E-76, Shri Nathpuram Kota (Raj.).
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr.Manoj Kumar for Mr.G.S.Gill For Respondent(s) : Mr.R.P.Garg
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
23/02/2024
Learned counsel for the parties are at ad-idem that the amount has been deposited by the State and paid to the respondent, hence no cause of action survives for pursuing the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Monika/18
State Of Rajasthan
Chief Engineer (East) And Additional Secretary Cad, Irrigation Building
Executive Engineer, Dayi Mukhya Nahar Khand Pratham, Cad
Ms Bharti Construction Company
AVNEESH JHINGAN
SHUBHA MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
