The Division Bench had already settled the controversy in Mahendra Kumar Jat case. Finding no valid reason to take a different view in the present petition, the Court dismissed the writ petition along with stay and other pending applications.
Writ petition, stay application, and all pending applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:34612]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2383/2022
(2 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:34612]
[CW-2383/2022]
R/o Village Post Gondusar, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Chaudhary
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
14/08/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:34612]
[CW-2383/2022]
(3 of 3)
the controversy involved in this petition has already been set at rest in the case of Mahendra Kumar Jat (supra) by the Division Bench of this Court, this Court finds no valid reason to take a different view.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
GARIMA /246
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mahendra Kumar Jat & Anr. vs. State of Raj. & Ors.; D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.986/2022Distinguished¶1
Kushal Bhardwaj and others
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
