Dismissed

Shahid Khan S/O Mataroo Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Aug 2024CW/2303/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order dismissing S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2303/2019 for posting multiple candidates as petitioners. The court filed a single-judge bench order stating the controversy was already settled in Rajkumar (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12182/2019). The petition was disposed of in light of similar directions previously issued granting NOC for recruitment processes to similarly situated ca

What the court decided

AI extract

Shahid Khan S/O Mataroo Khan Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:34568]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2303/2019

¶4

Shahid Khan S/o Mataroo Khan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Kasanwara, Post Sorai, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan.

¶5

Darshana Choudhary D/o Maya Ram Choudhary, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Nanvas, Tehsil Bhuhana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.

¶6

Rajiv Yadav S/o Vijay Yadav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Ghaseda, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.

¶7

Neha Goyal D/o Madan Mohan Goyal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Navin Jawellers Sarata Bazar, Hindaun, Karauli, Rajasthan.

¶8

Ramswaroop S/o Shrichand, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Mardatu Bari, Post Bibipur Chhota, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

¶9

Sunita Sharma D/o Krishan Kumar Sharma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Ward No. 23, Govind Nagar, Kacha Bhada, Chomu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶10

Kusum Gurjar D/o Avinash Poshwal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o P. No. 2B, Tejaji Mandir Marg, New Sanganer Road, Sodala, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶11

Mushtak Khan S/o Ishmal Khan, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Chouhari Ka Nagla, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar, Rajasthan.

¶12

Mahesh Chand Rawat S/o Malaram Rawat, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Gopalpura, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶13

Sunil Kumar Arya S/o Late Sh. Thandu Ram Arya, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Gopalpura, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶14

Urmila Sharma D/o Bajrang Lal Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 651, Barkat Nagar, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶15

Renu Kumari D/o Shri Kundan Lal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 273-D, Sindhi Colony, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

(2 of 5)

[2024:RJ-JP:34568]

[CW-2303/2019]

Rekha D/o Rohtash Kumar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vp Bhanot, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar, Rajasthan.

¶20

Chaman Sharma D/o Mahavir Prasad Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o VPO Rupahedi, Tehsil Hurd, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

¶21

Mahesh Kumar Saini S/o Ghasi Lal Saini, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 91, Mali Mohalla, Sewa, VPO Sewa, Tehsil Dudu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶22

Ajay Rathore S/o Narendra Kumar Rathore, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Imli Gate, Rathore Bhawan, Jhalarapat, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.

¶23

Prem Chand Meena S/o Ramphool Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kho Nagoriyan, Post Dantli, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶24

Roopnarayan Meena S/o Moti Lal Meena, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Thali, Post Bharni, Tehsil And District Tonk, Rajasthan.

¶25

Mamta D/o Rohitash Kumar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bijarnia Ki Dhani, Hukampura, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.

¶26

Mukesh Kumar Tailor S/o Mamraj Tailor, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No. 24, Khetri Road, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

¶27

Jaswant Singh Chauhan S/o Man Singh Chauhan, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo Rajapur, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan.

¶28

Sajjan Singh Inda S/o Panne Singh Inda, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Akaliya Chorya, Post Chopasani Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

¶29

Manish Yadav S/o Hari Narayan Yadav, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Roadways Depot Ke Piche, Tonk, Rajasthan.

¶30

Punam Chand Choudhary S/o Budhram Choudhary, Aged About 29 Years, R/o VPO Jasrasar, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

¶31

Mukesh Kumar Jat S/o Shri Ram Choudhary, Aged About 29 Years, R/o VPO Imamnagar, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk, Rajasthan.

¶32

Sandeep Kumar Sharma S/o Omprakash Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o VPO Jaun, Tehsil Nangal Rajawatan,

(3 of 5)

[2024:RJ-JP:34568]

[CW-2303/2019]

District Dausa, Rajasthan.

¶37

Mukesh Kumar Dewet S/o Bhagu Ram Dewet, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 10, Madhu Nagar, Sikar Road, Harmada, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶38

Santosh Devi Kumawat D/o Chhotu Ram Kumawat, W/o Puran Mal Chejara, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 27A, Vrindawan Vihar, Ninder Road, Harmada, Sikar Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶39

----Petitioners

¶40

Versus

¶41

State of Rajasthan, Through Director, Women And Child Development Department, 2, Jal Path, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur.

¶42

The Deputy Director (Administration), Integrated Child Development Services, 2, Jal Path, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur.

¶43

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board Through Its Chairman, State Institute of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur - 302018, Rajasthan.

¶44

----Respondents

¶45

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with Mr. Akash Gaur, Dy. GC Mr. Naman Maheshwari, Asst. GC

¶46

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

¶47

Order

¶48

14/08/2024

¶49

Counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in this petition has already been set at rest by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in the case of Rajkumar vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12182/2019). Counsel submits that the

[2024:RJ-JP:34568]

[CW-2303/2019]

(4 of 5)

instant petition be disposed of in the light of similar directions issued in the case of Rajkumar (surpa).

¶54

Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. As well as the order passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Rajkumar (supra).

¶55

Since the controversy involved in this petition has already been set at rest in the case of Rajkumar (supra) with the following prayers and directions:-

¶56

“This Court also observes that the petitioners have submitted applications for seeking permission for allowing their appearance in the Pre Primary Education Teacher Direct Recruitment Examination-2018 and then appeared in the written examination, whereafter on 31.07.2019, the petitioners have secured their respective roll numbers in the provisional list and were called for documents verification.

¶57

This Court also observes that the petitioners have made due compliance of the aforementioned condition No.14 of the advertisement in question. The petitioner clearly fell under the cut off marks criteria and were accordingly, called for documents verification by the respondents, and therefore, on this count also, the impugned action of the respondents in not issuing the requisite NOC in favour of the petitioners is not justified in law.

¶58

This Court further observes that in the case of other similarly situated persons, the respondents allowed them to participate in the recruitment process of the year 2013 (as reflected in Annexure-3 of the lead petition), whereas, the same treatment has not been meted out to the present petitioners, which is also not permissible in law.

¶59

Thus on a consideration of the overall facts and circumstances of the case, and in light of the aforesaid observations, the present petitions are allowed and while quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 08.01.2019, the respondent authorities are directed to issue the requisite NOC to the petitioners for further process in the recruitment in question, and the said NOC upon being issued shall be duly considered by the concerned respondent authorities, in

(5 of 5)

[2024:RJ-JP:34568]

[CW-2303/2019]

pursuance of the advertisement in question. All pending applications also stand disposed of.”

¶64

Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of in the

¶65

light of similar directions issued in the case of Rajkumar (supra).

¶66

Stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶67

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶68

GARIMA /38

Shahid Khan S/O Mataroo Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Shahid Khan S/O Mataroo Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushma Jha D/O Shri Ram Bharosi Jha W/O Late Shri Jai Prakash Jha Vs Union of India

Instrumentation Sevanivrat Kar Vs U O I Heavy Indust Ors.

Meena Kumar Meena Vs State Education Departmentors

Sumer Singh S/O Hari Singh Vs the G.O.C (Patron, Hq, 61 Sub Area, Ex- Servicemen Canteen, Org.)

Smt. Indira Devi Sharma W/O and Nominee of Retired Ndsi, Late Shri Kalicharan Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Kushal Bhardwaj S/O Narender Bhardwaj Vs Rajasthan Staff Selection Board