Single judge dismissed a writ petition against State of Rajasthan, holding that the controversy was already settled by the Supreme Court in State of Rajasthan and Ors vs Trilok Ram which affirmed a earlier Division Bench decision.
Present writ petition, stay application and all pending applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18472/2018
Arjun Ram S/o Hari Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Dau Ka Bass, Ward No. 02, Ashapurna Road, Pokran, Jaisalmer, Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. G.K. Sharma-Addl.G.C. |
| Mr. S. Yadav |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
31/08/2024
(2 of 2)
[CW-18472/2018]
Special Leave to Petition filed by the State, hence, this Court finds no valid reason to take a different view.
State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Trilok Ram .
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Ashu/142
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition requires a different view given the binding decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Rajasthan vs Trilok Ram.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Trilok Ram Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors, D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 667/2015Distinguished¶1
The State of Rajasthan and Ors Vs. Trilok RamFollowed¶13
The State of Rajasthan and Ors Vs. Trilok Ram, (2019) 10 SCC 383 · Who else cites this
Arjun Ram S/o Hari Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
