The High Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a representation to be decided expeditiously by the competent authority. Pending applications were also disposed of.
Liberty to file a representation to be decided expeditiously by the competent authority; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:6580]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1621/2024
Madan Lal S/o Shri Chetan Ram, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Mansuriya Colony, Barmer.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Sushil Solanki |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : --- |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order
08/02/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:6580]
[CW-1621/2024]
(2 of 2)
(ARUN MONGA),J
37-DhananjayS/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioner should be granted liberty to file a representation for consideration by the competent authority.
Whether pending applications in the matter should be disposed of.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sardar Mal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Referred¶1
Sardar Mal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9772/2011
Man Singh Hada & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.Referred¶1
Man Singh Hada & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8124/2012
Madan Lal
State of Rajasthan
Deputy Commissioner Cum Deputy Secretary - Ii
District Collector
Vikas Adhikari
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
