Preksha Palawat D/O Rajendra Singh, v. Rajasthan Public Service Commission
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petitions were rendered infructuous as submitted by counsel. The court dismissed the petitions and disposed of pending applications.
Writ petitions were rendered infructuous as submitted by counsel. The court dismissed the petitions and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:31491]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 25315/2018
Sampat Kumari Dhakar D/o Daulat Ram Dhakar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Ladpura Kundal, Tehsil Rawatbhata, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan Public Service Commission Through Its Secretary, Ajmer.
----Respondent Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1427/2019
Preksha Palawat D/o Rajendra Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o 44 (A), Valmiki Marg, Gomes Defence Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order
25/07/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that these civil writ petitions are rendered infructuous.
The civil writ petitions are dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Manish/82-83
Sampat Kumari Dhakar
Rajasthan Public Service Commission Through Its Secretary
Preksha Palawat
Rajasthan Public Service Commission
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court