The High Court of Rajasthan held that S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12329/2012 and connected W.P. No.14724/2012 were rendered infructuous and dismissed the same accordingly.
Petitions dismissed as infructuous; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:15808]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12329/2012
Jagdish Prasad Sabu S/o Late Rameshwarlal R/o Ward No.8, Srimadhopur Distt. Sikar (Since deceaesed) Hence represented through his legal representatives:
1/4 Smt. Rukmani Devi aged about 75 years W/o Late Jagdish Prasad
All are R/o Ward No.8 Srimadhopur Distt. Sikar
1/5 Smt. Durga Devi W/o Jugal Kishore Baheti D/o Late Jagdish Prasad r/o aloda distt. Sikar
1/7 Smt. Draupati Devi W/o Nandkishore Toshniwal D/o Late Jagdish Prasad R/o Makrana Distt. Nagaur
1/8 Smt. Indra Devi W/o Ashok Kabra D/o Late Jagdish Prasad R/o Madanganj Kishangarh Distt. Ajmer
----Petitioner/Plaintiffs
Versus
(At Present Residing at C/o Naresh Garments 1463/60 Netaji Ki Gali Gandhinagar Delhi)
----Respondent/Defendant
----Respondent/Applicant
----Persona Designata/Proforma Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14724/2012
Mool Chand S/o Narayan Sabu aged about 67 years R/o C/o Sabu Textile Corporation 10/387 Rajaram Road Kichlakaranji Distt Kolhapur Maharashtra Presently C/o Kailash Chand Sabu Chandrak Apartment Ganga Jamna Colony Murlipura Jaipur
----Petitioner/Defendant
Versus
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:15808]
[CW-12329/2012]
---Non-Petitioners/Plaintiffs
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanmay Dhand (respondent in S.B. CWP No.14724/2012) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Satish Khandal (petitioner in S.B. CWP No.12329/2012)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order
04/04/2024
Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that these civil writ petitions are rendered infructuous.
The petitions are dismissed accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
PRAGATI/25-26
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil writ petitions should be allowed or dismissed given that they are infructuous.
Jagdish Prasad Sabu LRs
Civil Judge (Sr. Division) No.1, Sikar
Mool Chand
Rudmal
Mahend Kumar Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
