This single-paragraph order dismisses a civil writ petition on the admission that the petitioner's counsel seeks to withdraw the petition to avail of an alternative legal remedy. No substantive legal principles were laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:18424]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12030/2016
Shankar Lal S/o Late Shri Babu Lal Saini, aged about 50 years, Tiba Ki Dhani, Village Mundru, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 20/04/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition as he has instructions to avail the appropriate remedy available under the law for redressal of his grievance(s).
The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Sudha/64
Shankar Lal S/o Late Shri Babu Lal Saini
State Of Rajasthan
Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sikar
Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Mundru
Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Shrimadhopur
Pradhan, Panchayat Samiti, Shrimadhopur
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
