Private ITIs filed a writ petition against State of Rajasthan and Director of Technical Education. Counsel submitted that no cause of action survived with the efflux of time; the court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:31203]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11333/2018
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Aradhna Swami for Mr. Khurshid Ahmed Khan For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav,AAG with Ms. Archana Mr. Rahul Kumar Mr. Harshit Kakani Maheshwari
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order
24/07/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with efflux of time, no cause of action survives for pursuing the petition.
In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Simple Kumawat/61
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition remained maintainable, given that no cause of action survives with efflux of time.
Mayur Pvt. Iti
Shekhwati Pvt. Iti
Shri Bachchu Arun Private Iti
State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Technical Education
Director, Technical Education, Rajasthan
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
