Disposed

Manju v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Mar 2024CRLW/547/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-judge court disposed of a writ petition under Article 226 seeking security against life threats. No observation in the order interfered with any criminal or civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to appear before Superintendent of Police with representation regarding grievance; observation not to affect ongoing criminal or civil proceedings.

Manju Vs State of Rajasthan — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:12015]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 547/2024

¶4

Manju D/o Shri Ogdaram Seervi, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Aadiya Bera, Kushalpura, Teh Raipur, Dist Beawar, Raj.

¶5

Jagaram S/o Shri Mangilal Seervi, age about 40 years, R/o Lilamba, Tehsil Raipur, District Beawar, Rajasthan.

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

The Superintendent Of Police, Beawar

¶10

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Beawar.

¶11

SHO, PS Raipur, Dist Beawar.

¶12

Bhawarlal S/o Shri Punaram Seervi, R/o Bera Peepliya, Village Lasni (Laani) Teh Jaitaran, Dist Beawar, At Present Mathaji Medical No. 167, Krishna Garden Main Road, Rajarajeshwari Nagar, Banglore, Karnataka.

¶13

Priya W/o Shri Bhawarlal Seervi, R/o Bera Peepliya, Village Lasni (Laani) Teh Jaitaran, Dist Beawar, At Present Mathaji Medical No. 167, Krishna Garden Main Road, Rajarajeshwari Nagar, Banglore, Karnataka.

¶14

----Respondents

¶15

For Petitioner(s)	: Ms. Manju Present-in-person Mr.
	Jagaram Present-in-person
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. S.K. Bhati,PP

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

¶17

Order

¶18

13/03/2024

¶19

The petitioners have preferred this Writ Petition under under Article 226 of the Constitution Of India for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondent Nos.5 & 6.

[2024:RJ-JD:12015]

[CRLW-547/2024]

(2 of 2)

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides for right to life, limb and personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to the same amounts to violation of the same. Being the citizens of independent India, the petitioners have right to reside with honour and dignity. Therefore, they have sought the protection from the hands of private respondents and they also sought direction to respondents to provide them protection.

¶24

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as perusing the record of the case, since the petitioners apprehend threat to their right of life and liberty, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioners have every right to seek the protection of their life, limb and liberty; and therefore persuade to dispose of the present petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear before the concerned Superintendent of Police along with appropriate representation regarding their grievance. The concerned Superintendent of Police shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

¶25

It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners.

¶26

Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶27

(FARJAND ALI),J

¶28

4-minki/-

Manju v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manju v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharampal Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- Udaipur Vs M/S Saileela Synthetics Pvt. Ltd.

Mehboob Khan Vs State and Ors.

Govind Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Jethi Devi Vs the State of Rajasthan

State of Rajasthan Vs Bhanwar Lal