The petitioner sought judicial review regarding criminal proceedings. The Public Prosecutor reported that the investigating officer filed a complaint before the Execution Magistrate under Sections 107 and 116 CrPC. The writ petition was rendered infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:32771]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1577/2021
Promod Gilhotara S/o Late Shri Parmanand Gilhotara, R/o C-341, Hans Marg, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order
01/08/2024
Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the state and has submitted the factual report, from which it is clear that after completing the investigation, the Investigating Officer has filed the complaint against the accused persons before the Execution Magistrate under Sections 107 and 116 CrPC.
In view of the matter, the petition filed by the petitioner, has been rendered infructuous.
It is accordingly disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Tahir/419
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Promod Gilhotara
State Of Rajasthan
Secretary Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan
Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi Jaipur
Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate Jaipur
Dy. Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate Jaipur
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
