Vena and Anr. v. State of Raj.
Case brief
What is this about?
This delayed criminal revision petition challenged an order fixing the petitioners' age based on Section 146 Cr.P.C. while applying a retrospective provision. The High Court held the petitioners were entitled to full statutory age period and assured deposit coverage for age allowances to resolve finality questions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:18168]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 759/2004
- Vena S/o Gokal
- Mangu S/o Kalu, Both R/o Mungana, Tehsil Kapasan, District Chittorgarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Raj.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pritam Joshi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Judgment 25/04/2024
bl ekeys esa fuxjkuhdrkZ os.kk o ekaxw ds laca/k esa Fkkukf/kdkjh iqfyl Fkkuk diklu] ftyk fpRrkSM+x<+ dh vksj ls fnukad 17-12-2023 dks izsf"kr fjiksVZ ds eqrkfcd nksuksa fuxjkuhdrkZ dh eR;q 14&15 o"kZ iwoZ gks pqdh gSA bl U;k;ky; ds }kjk Fkkukf/kdkjh] iqfyl Fkkuk diklu dks Hksts x;s uksfVl dh iq'r ij yxHkx 15 o"kZ iwoZ bu nksuksa dh eR;q gksuk] uhjt ,Q-lh- ua- 1667 }kjk iwNrkN ds vk/kkj ij fjiksVZ dh xbZ gS vkSj dk;kZy; xzke iapk;r eqaxkukk ls eR;q rLnhd izek.k&i= fnukad 17-12-2023 dk izkIr fd;k] ftlds eqrkfcd os.kk dh eR;q 12&13 lky iwoZ o ekaxw dh eR;q 13&14 o"kZ iwoZ gks pqdh gS vkSj nksuksa ds eR;q izek.k&i= tkjh ugha gq, gSaA bl ekeys esa xkao ds ekSrfcjku dh rLnhd fjiksVZ Hkh uhjt ,Q-lh- ua1667 }kjk rS;kj dh xbZ gSA ftlls nksuksa fuxjkuhdrkZx.k dh e`R;q gks tkuk Li"V gSA
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to the statutory 15-year period over which their age was calculated despite the statutory provision being made applicable retrospectively.
Whether the original impugned order acquires finality by the time the High Court considers the revision petition under Section 397 CrPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vena S/o Gokal
- petitioner
Mangu S/o Kalu
- respondent
State Of Raj.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/759/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court