Allowed

Harpinder Singh @ Pinder v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Apr 2024CRLMB/5038/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur disposed of a bail application under Section 439 CrPC. The court accorded bail to the petitioner after recording his undertaking not to impart judgement and to abide by other conditions as applicable under the law.

What did the court decide?

Bail accorded to the petitioner on the condition of personally appearing and fulfilling the Court's order.

Harpinder Singh @ Pinder Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:18082]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5038/2024

¶4

Harpinder Singh @ Pinder S/o Sardar Inder Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ward No. 07, Fatehgarh Churian, Teh Batala, Ps Fatehgarh Churian, Dist Gurdaspur, Punjab (Lodged In Central Jail, Hanumangarh)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

	Versus
State Of Rajasthan,	Through PP ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Abhisek Agarwal, Mr. Ashish Gehlot
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Muktiyar Khan,PP

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶8

Order

¶9

25/04/2024

¶10

01izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk guqekux<+ Vkmu ftyk guqekux<+ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 183@2024] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@18 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- vf/kfu;e ds ekeys esa izLrqr gqvk gSA

¶11

02geus cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA 03fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA lg&vfHk;qDr foDdh elhg dh tekur bl ekeys esa gks pqdh gSA lg&vfHk;qDr o izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls dqy 900 xzke vQhe cjken gksus dk vkjksi gS tks okf.kfT;d ek=k ls de gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 49@2017 iqfyl Fkkuk Qrsgx<+ pwfj;ku ds ekeys esa U;k;ky; U;kf;d eftLVªsV cVkyk] ftyk xq:nkliqj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 06-10-2022 ds }kjk nks"keqDr fd;k tk pqdk gSA ,slh voLFkk esa vU; dksbZ izdj.k ,uMhih,l vf/kfu;e ds rgr izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) yafcr ugha gSA fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk gSA bu vk/kkjksa ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JD:18082]

[CRLMB-5038/2024]

04blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶16

05tekur vkosnu ij euu fd;k] i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA vkjksi i= izLrqr fd;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls cjken eknd inkFkZ okf.kfT;d ek=k ls de gksuk crk;k x;k gSA lg&vfHk;qDr foDdh elhg dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= la[;k 4519@2024 bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 18-04-2024 dks Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vU; dksbZ izdj.k ,uMhih,l vf/kfu;e ds rgr yafcr ugha gksuk crk;k x;k gSA fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk ls budkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA

¶17

06cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk tqeZ dh izd`fr o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶18

07ifj.kker% tekur vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr gjfiUnz flag mQZ fiUnj iq= ljnkj bUnz flag mi;qZDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds ekeys esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mls bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶19

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶20

16-S N LOHRA/-

Harpinder Singh @ Pinder v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harpinder Singh @ Pinder v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Himmata Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Khumaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhanraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Vena and Anr. Vs State of Raj.

Mulchand Prajapat Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan