Sugan Chand v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition filed under proviso 25(6A) of G.S.R. 384(E) regarding a previous judgment ordering jail and fine. High Court法庭 dismisses the petition as not maintainable under the said provision.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as not maintainable under the cited provision.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JP:42686]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 514/2006
Sugan Chand s/o Bhola Ram R/o Trilokpura District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus State ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nirbhay Tiwari for Mr.Manu Bhargava For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R.Dhakad, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order
09/10/2024
fuxjkdkj@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk fo}ku U;k;ky; U;kf;d eftLVsªV] t;iqj ftyk t;iqj ds vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k 209@1994 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 26-08-2002 ftlds }kjk mls vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 279] 337] 338] 304&, Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 187 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e ds vijk/k esa nks"kfl) djrs gq, vf/kdre nks o"kZ ds lJe dkjkokl ,oa dqy nks lkS ipkl :i;s ds vFkZn.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k Fkk ,oa mlds fo:) izLrqr vihy fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k t;iqj ftyk t;iqj dh QkStnkjh vihy la[;k 79@02 ds fujLr fd, tkus lEcU/kh ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 18-04-2006 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us fuxjkdkj@vfHk;qDr lqxu pan dh eR;q rLnhd fjiksVZ e; eR;q izek.k&i= dh izfr is'k dhA pwafd fuxjkdkj@vfHk;qDr dh e`R;q gks pqdh gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa bl iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk dks pyk, tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA vr% ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk blh vk/kkj ij fujLr dh tkrh gSA vU; dksbZ izkFkZuk&i= ;fn yfEcr gks rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fujLr fd, tkrs gSaA
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Revision Petition falls under proviso 25(6A) of G.S.R. 384 (E) and is thus maintainable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sugan Chand
- respondent
State
Coram
Hubha Mehta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/514/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court