Revision petition against conviction of accused under IPC sections 451, 323, 341 and 307 in a SC/ST Act case. Petitioner sold his house in 2008 and could not be traced; no one appeared for him. The court dismissed the revision petition as abandoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:42720]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1057/2006
Ramji Lal s/o Bhagirath aged about 55 years, R/o B-40 Roop Sagar Colony, Near mukharji Farm House ke pas, Sirsi Road Meenawala, Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R.Dhakad, PP Ms.Muskan Verma
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
09/10/2024
fuxjkdkj@ifjoknh dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk fo}ku U;k;ky; fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k vuqlwfpr tkfr@tutkfr ¼vfuiz½ t;iqj jkt- ds ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 101@2005 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 01-04-2006 ftlds }kjk izR;FkhZ la[;k&2 vfHk;qDr guqeku lgk; dks vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 451] 323] 341] 307 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k esa nks"keqDr fd;k x;k Fkk] ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
fuxjkdkj@ifjoknh dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls mlds fo}ku vf/koDrk mifLFkr gSaA
ifjoknh ds vuqifLFkr gksus ds dkj.k bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 21-08-2024 dks mls tekurh okj.V ls ryc fd;k x;k FkkA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk izLrqr fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj ifjoknh us o"kZ 2008 esa edku foØ; dj fn;k tkuk ,oa orZeku edku ekfyd }kjk Hkh ifjoknh ds fuokl ds ckjs esa vufHkKrk tkfgj djuk rFkk Hkjld iz;kl ds ckotwn ifjoknh jkethyky ds thfor vFkok e`r
[2024:RJ-JP:42720]
[CRLR-1057/2006]
(2 of 2)
gksus ds ckjs esa tkudkjh ugha feyuk vafdr fd;k x;k gSA U;k;ky; ds le{k ifjoknh dh vksj ls bl ;kfpdk dks pykus okyk dksbZ i{kdkj@izfrfuf/k mifLFkr ugha gSA izdj.k o"kZ 2006 ls yfEcr py jgk gSA vr% bu ifjLFkfr;ksa esa bl iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk dks fcuk ifjoknh dh mifLFkfr ds vkxs pyk, tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA vr% ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk blh vk/kkj ij fujLr dh tkrh gSA vU; dksbZ izkFkZuk&i= ;fn yfEcr gks rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fujLr fd, tkrs gSaA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition should proceed when the petitioner is untraceable and no representative appears despite bail bonds
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramji Lal s/o Bhagirath
State of Rajasthan through P.P.
Hanuman Sahai s/o Kaluram
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
