In a state of compromise between the parties, the Rajasthan High Court allowed the criminal revision petition and set aside the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, acquitting the petitioner-accused.
Order of conviction and sentence set aside; petitioner-accused acquitted under Section 138 NI Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:43072]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 300/2005
Rajkumar Jain S/o Shri Phool Chand Jain, R/o Opposite Sangam Cinema, Sanganer, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Madhukar Shyam Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order
09/10/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:43072]
[CRLR-300/2005]
(2 of 2)
stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J
GAURAV /04
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision petition filed by the accused-maggrieved is maintainable in light of compromise entered between parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajkumar Jain
State of Rajasthan
Ashok Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
