Petitioner sought revision against dismissal of Section 138 NI Act complaint due to filing by POA. Petitioner withdrew petition due to accused's death. Court disposed of petition without merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:12710]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 6/2005
Kinushk Sharma S/o Shri Shiv Charan Sharma, through power of attorney holder Shri Shiv Charan Sharma S/o Shri Narayan Ved Pathi, R/o 1, Pradhan Marg, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioner/ complainant
Versus
Santosh Kumar Agarwal S/o Shri Sagar Mal, proprietor M/s Ganpati Textiles, 8-A, Dueshra Kothi Road, Amer road, Jaipur.
----Respondent/ Accused
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
13/03/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:12710]
[CRLR-6/2005]
(2 of 2)
attorney, is not proper, yet, petitioner does not want to pursue this petition, because of death of accused, hence, without entering into merits of the issue that arises in the present criminal revision petition, the petition stands disposed of since withdrawn by the petitioner.
(SUDESH BANSAL), J
RONAK/53
Kinushk Sharma
Santosh Kumar Agarwal
Sudes Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
