Petitioner challenged bail bond forfeiture order. Court held no interference warranted without fresh application to trial court. Petition dismissed.
Petition and stay application disposed of without interference to the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:12297]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1151/2024
Akshatraj Kothari S/o Shri Anil Kothari, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 3-A-25, Housing Board, Banswara, Police Station Kotwali, Banswara, Distt. Banswara (Raj).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
12/03/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:12297]
[CRLMP-1151/2024]
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SOURAV /10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's petition filed after the forfeiture of bail bonds under Section 446 Cr.P.C. merits interference due to non-appearance in another case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Akshatraj Kothari
State Of Rajasthan
Sudes Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
