Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter had already been decided after full consideration, leaving nothing pending in this revision petition. The court accordingly dismissed the petition as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:20546]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1923/2016
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain Mr. Gaurav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
01/05/2024
;kph ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dk fuosnu gS fd bl izdj.k esa fopkj.k iw.kZ iw.kZ gksdj fu.kZ; ikfjr gks pqdk gSA
,slh fLFkfr esa bl ;kfpdk esa vc dksbZ dk;Zokgh 'ks"k ugha gSA vr% mDr rF;ksa ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fu"Qy gks xbZ gSA
ifj.kker% ;g ;kfpdk fu"Qy gksus ds vk/kkj ij fujLr dh tkrh
gSA
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
MAHESH ADWANI /96
Ramavtar Son Of Devlal
Mukesh Son Of Devlal
The State Of Rajasthan
Ramesh Chand Khatik Son Of Shri Ramdev Khatik
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
