Nasir v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This S.B. Criminal Revision Petition challenged an order upholding conviction and sentencing. The High Court partly allowed the petition, maintaining the conviction but reducing the sentence to the period already undergone, and discharged bail bonds.
What did the court decide?
Sentence reduced to period already undergone; bail bonds discharged; need not surrender.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JP:20542]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 188/2004
Nasir S/o Babu, Age 22 years R/o Deshera Maidan Gangapur City, Distt. Sawaimadhopur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan |
|---|---|
| Mr. Sanjay Gurjar | |
| Mr. Ritesh Kumawat | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Suresh Kumar, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
01/05/2024
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the sentence awarded to the petitioner should be reduced to the period of imprisonment already undergone given the pending nature of the case since 2004.
Whether the petitioner needs to surrender when he is not currently in judicial custody.
Whether bail bonds of the petitioner should be discharged upon reduction of sentence.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nasir
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/188/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court