The High Court of Jaipur dismissed a pending criminal revision petition for want of prosecution. It observed the petitioner had lost interest and offered liberty to revive the petition in future.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; liberty granted to apply for revival.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 186/2020
Naveen Sharma S/o Shri Jagdish Raj Sharma, R/o 3-B, Vijay Mandal Enclave, Hauz Khas New Delhi Presently R/o 224, Dilorio Circle Ancaster Ontario, L9K1T1 Canada.
----Petitioner
Versus
Meenal Bhargava W/o Naveen Sharma D/o Shri Navnit Bhargav, R/o Bhargav House, Behind Revenue Board Civil Lines, Ajmer Raj.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : None present
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order
20/05/2024
This petition is lying pending before this Court in defect side for last several years and no steps have been taken by the counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter and he/she has lost interest in pursuing this matter.
In view of the above, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
However, the petitioner would be at liberty to move application for revival of this petition, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives.
Stay application and all application(s), pending if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Aayush Sharma/617
Naveen Sharma
Meenal Bhargava
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
