The Court allowed a petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR for cheating and forgery offences after the petitioner entered into a compromise with the complainant, relying on Supreme Court precedents.
FIR No.1107/2022 registered at Police Station Kardhani, District Jaipur (West) is quashed and set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:650]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 9957/2022
Virendra Verma S/o Shri Madan Lal Verma, R/o Plot No. D-96, Saraswati Nagar, Behind North Western Railway Office, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
04/01/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:650]
[CRLMP-9957/2022]
(2 of 2)
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
CHARU SONI /640
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR registered for offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC is liable to be quashed in view of a compromise arrived at between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & AnrApplied¶5
2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934
State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors.Applied¶5
AIR 1992 SC 604 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Virendra Verma
State Of Rajasthan Through PP
Gajanand Raigar
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
