Criminal miscellaneous petition seeking quashing of FIR and consequential proceedings on the basis of a compromise deed between the parties. Relying on Gian Singh, the court invoked inherent powers and quashed the FIR and all proceedings against the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:29087]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 840/2024
Komal Soni W/o Shri Parshuram Soni @ Sudarshan Soni, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Bagdi Mohalla,bikaner (Raj)
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Palak Mahecha |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Mohd. Javed Gori, P.P. |
| Mr. | Basil Mohd.,through VC |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order
16/07/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JD:29087]
[CRLMP-840/2024]
SCC 303]. He urges that the impugned FIR and all consequential proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise.
(ARUN MONGA),J
109-AnilKC/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No.94/2023 and consequential proceedings could be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on the basis of compromise between the parties?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.Applied¶4
[(2012) 10 SCC 303] · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Komal Soni
State of Rajasthan
Prakash Nirmal Modi
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
