Dismissed
Champa Lal v. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan HCCRLMP/442/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition dismissed as not pressed; counsel for the petitioner chose not to press it.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
[2024:RJ-JD:28963]
¶2
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶3
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 442/2024
¶4
Champa Lal S/o Ghanshyam Menaria, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Khermaliya, Police Station Chhoti Sadari, District Pratapgarh.
¶5
----Petitioner
¶6
Versus
¶7
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
¶8
| ----Respondent | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Naresh Khatri |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Gaurav Singh,PP |
¶9
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
¶10
Order
¶11
16/07/2024
¶12
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this petition.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Champa Lal S/o Ghanshyam Menaria
- respondent
State of Rajasthan, through PP
Coram
AI extract
Arun Monga
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/442/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court