This criminal miscellaneous petition filed for quashing an FIR was disposed of as infructuous since the trial Court had already disposed of the case.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:33654]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 707/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deen Dayal Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
07/08/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:33654]
[CRLMP-707/2020]
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the trial Court has disposed of the case. Hence, this Criminal Misc. Petition for quashing the FIR No. 398/2019 has been rendered infructuous.
It is accordingly disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Tahir.96
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Misc. Petition for quashing the FIR is maintainable having been rendered infructuous by the disposal of the trial case.
Narpat Singh Dewda and others
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
